Here’s a quick document i put together to assemble some clues on IOTS to form a plan given the 30% drop in stock price … i bought more and will be buying more based on this analysis.
With great thanks to authors
My take-away echos most of the 8-10 articles i dove into today … short term looks good, longer term the fabric is starting to fray; tread carefully
This is a delightful and useful read – the comments this time are more about the author’s style, etc than a discourse on the content
I find the use of data, scenarios and inference most welcome … then i can derive my own view and conclusions.
Note: This is one of my ‘must read’ posts every Sunday – here are the elements i found useful and interesting.
Quote: The punditry should prepare for a week where Anything Goes.
- Jeff’s comment: “The market was up 1.5%, a very nice gain. The week’s trading range was only 1.2, lower than the last few weeks and much lower than the long-term average.”
- My comment: I am finding that ‘big’ money hits in last 10 minutes of trading days. Look at the volume spikes at day’s end. This week each spike furthered the day’s trend, yet Friday’s end petered out.
CPI both Headline and Core – External pointer https://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/2018/07/13/inflation-an-x-ray-view-of-the-components
- I found this graphic telling
More on sentiment — investor sentiment may have shifted this week – while as this author points out it’s not ‘really high’. I pay attention to these shifts, both for contrairian indicator and increasing awareness on spikes in FOMO buys from inexperienced investors and traders. http://www.horancapitaladvisors.com/blog/2018/07/12/sentiment-is-widely-positive
- 10 yr flat from last quarter
- Higher S&P 500
- Anticipated inflation down slightly, but risk of inflation increasing
External link to 7 year rate of return forecasts https://pensionpartners.com/the-next-7-years/
- in many of the divergences, mutliple / value expansion beyond normal expectations ruled
- seems sooner or later mean regression plays its part … the timing is always a mystery and its catalyst unknown as of yet
- The one key take away from both prediction sets (2011 and 2018) is that rates of returns across the different groups are MUCH lower in the 2018 set. – I agree
Jeff’s closing had two points that i found interesting
- Quote: “Earnings season. Everything suggests a big increase over last year – 20% or so. The forward guidance last quarter was good, and the tax cut effects are playing out. This may not translate into higher stock prices unless the report is perfect. The market meme emphasizes trade war, strong dollar, and rising costs. Any company that highlights these themes in the outlook will see an instant reaction in the stock price.”
- Earnings conference calls should be brutal this quarter if folks are doing their jobs and folks w/ downside views are going to get punished severely. But this also sets up companies exaggerating 2H 2018 and more importantly 2019
- Quote on worrying topic: “The trade war. With the apparently modest market reaction, more of the punditry is concluding that victory is in the cards. Actually, stocks would probably be about 10% higher without the trade concerns.”
- This i struggle with … i doubt if the FANG folks would be 10% higher, but maybe broader participation.
This guy has a great way of pushing aside the noise and superficial headlines that do not help. This set of questions is incredibly important to really dig thru the noise to find your view on job-based inflationary pressures. Other than prices, this is the other big element; after reading these questions, one has to ask how much employment pressure there really is.
There are some nuggets in the post and in the comments. Here is my favorite (bold mine): “Read an interesting article that the currency bottomed Friday afternoon. It was a good article about how the Chinese guys have been wanting to do this but couldn’t. Now they did it & blamed it on the trade war & not on the real reason that they need a weaker currency to stimulate domestic growth. Sneaky guys with a 3000 yr old civilization. What do they know about social order?“
Not to emphasize ‘sneaky’, but that the Chinese leaders have a long history of trials, failures and successes. They also have the ability to influence the Chinese economy with precision and agility that other countries just cannot do. I keep watching for irrational bargains surfacing.
This report helps a bit … while superficial data brush (it’s free afterall) … their summary that a) growth deceleration is not that bad, b) the economic policy transition to consumption is working (while early), c) tech and consumer companies do not carry the same level of troubled debt that manufacturers carry, and d) the trade war is the biggest risk.
This has not changed my favorable long term view on both China technology and Tencent specifically
Lance’s weekly update has a very interesting data set that I assumed was true, but had not seen it so easily / clearly described. I am leaning toward another longer term position in SPY Puts …
Here is the data set – “copied”
However, with the ongoing trade war rhetoric brewing between China and the U.S., a negative surprise certainly maintains a high enough probability to pay attention to.
As I noted over the last few weeks, participation remains concerning as Bob Farrell’s rule #7 states:
“Markets are strongest when they are broad and weakest when they narrow to a handful of blue-chip names.”
For the year, 10 stocks have made up almost entirely all of the gains of the market. Actually, a better way would be to say:
“The top-10 stocks have more than offset the losses from the rest of constituents so far this year given the markets are only up 3.22% ytd.”
This is an absolutely critical data set to watch thru the Q2 earnings reporting … any company that misses their segment revenue growth is a prime short candidate; any sector collectively less than this, trouble. What i am most interested in is the next version of this w/ >75% of reporting complete. Will these revenue growth rates hold, or will they be revised downward? I am not that interested in earnings at this point.
Heisenberg (SA Author that many love to hate but many read) posted a great review of the recent trade war … https://seekingalpha.com/article/4185844-island-life
There are two points that really surfaced for me … a) the tit-tat between US and China are moves that actually go against each’s best economic interests, and b) the timing of the US FED interest rates being used as a political cataylst to control further trade actions (this surfaces nicely in the comments). Some of this analysis is disturbing if political intentions are really behind these moves (US moves). That signifies that policy makers may not really care too much about the near / intermediate impact to workers (and consumers) for their own political gain. If that is the core of the strategy, it is very, very sad