WAT = Walking around town
A beautiful sunny afternoon after several just as nice …
WAT = Walking around town
A beautiful sunny afternoon after several just as nice …
Today us investors had one hell of a day …
Mott Capital Management nailed it today in a rather long technical view of today’s prices.
Copying the key visualization to support the quote …
Quote –> “And if the market is going to destroy everything created from October on, it means it needs to go back to the very beginning. To somewhere between 2860 to 2940. But at this point, who knows! Nobody. This is what happens when you combine ETF’s, Algo’s, and leverage together.”
The BOLD emphasis is mine … that nailed my view. These instruments were not that widely used the last time we had this magnitude of selling pressure both duration and depth. Until recently, they had only been ‘tested’ with upward pressure … we maybe in another financial science experiment like bundled mortgage-backed securities in our not-too-distant past.
A corporate president I interfaced with often one time said to our team, “you have completely failed to understand the power of the English language.” How we use language has tremendous impact on what we can accomplish with other humans. Grist has some great advice!
Key words and their ‘non jargon’ explanation … which would you prefer to hear? (quoted below)
Quote – no comment needed
The United States could generate 20% of its electricity from wind within 10 years, without requiring any additional land, according to Cornell University research published in Nature Scientific Reports.
“The United States currently produces about 7% of its electricity from wind energy,” said Sara Pryor, professor in the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences. “This research shows that a quadrupling of the installed capacity of wind turbines from 2014 levels will allow us to attain the goal of 20% of electricity from the wind, without requiring additional land, or negative impacts on systemwide efficiency or local climates.”
while this data is interesting, what was the baseline … just looking at changes w/out knowing the starting point renders an actionable inference impossible. This is not helpful, but still somewhat interesting to ask another set of questions
Heisenberg gathered some info from some of his friends, and I am paying attention! Not sure exactly what more I can do to ‘defend my portfolio’, but I will not be surprised if a 2000 tech refresh hits the air waves.
Quote: “With the bulk of US companies having reported, we have summed up the report and accounts posted so far. Despite strong markets last year, net income barely moved, with a rise of just 0.3%. More worrying is without the Big 5 companies (Microsoft, Alphabet, Apple, Amazon and Facebook), net income fell 7.5%.“
And if you just want a bit more poison in your coffee, quote: “In valuation terms the divergence of tech forward PEs from the overall market has only been a very recent phenomenon. And just as notable is the extreme divergence of valuations between tech and value stocks something not seen since the late 1990s Nasdaq bubble. One key difference with the late 1990s Nasdaq bubble is that it is now not just tech (and growth stocks generally) that have reached extreme levels (both in absolute terms and relative to value stocks). Quality stocks (with sound balance sheets) have also joined the party.”
I am often reminded how much money and effort is spent convincing the public and investors things are not all that they seem to be … call it spin, call it manipulation, call it bulls^^t … it’s all the same and as investors putting our hard earned and saved capital to work requires us to do our due diligence
Regardless if you fully believe the points made here in this post, investors need to pay attention … it’s time to REALLY read SEC submitted documents and annual reports, not just press snippets.
Here’s the reference section, quote: “Yellen referenced a McKinsey report on automation, artificial intelligence (AI), and the future of work that estimates about half of current jobs could be automated by new technologies. What happens to the people who are displaced? Many are likely to end up in low productivity jobs. And that, Yellen said, is “a scary prospect.”
Agree or disagree on the specifics or the particulars of skill sets or geography, the magnitude of the changes are probably not too far off … a tremendous inflection point.
Again, regardless of how accurate you believe these numbers and supporting details are, a dialogue is over due on contingency, mitigation and transition plans … a transition of this magnitude (people) takes time, and technology is consistently proving to transition faster! The only national level politician that spoke this narrative was Andrew Yang – I hope he re-enters the discussion soon!
Quote: “Researchers have set a world record for the conversion of solar energy to electricity via the use of tiny nanoparticles called ‘quantum dots’. The technology has a huge range of potential applications, including the possibility to use it as a flexible, transparent skin to power cars, planes, homes and wearable technology.”
This is really cool if it pans out and is commercially viable; no surprise that the research does NOT come from US (seems we spend all our research $ on guns and bombs).
A bit more detail, quote: “Professor Wang’s team set the world record for quantum dot solar cell efficiency by developing a unique surface engineering strategy. Overcoming previous challenges around the fact that the surface of quantum dots tend to be rough and unstable — making them less efficient at converting solar into electrical current. “This new generation of quantum dots is compatible with more affordable and large-scale printable technologies,” said Professor Wang. “The near 25 per cent improvement in efficiency we have achieved over the previous world record is important. It is effectively the difference between quantum dot solar cell technology being an exciting ‘prospect’ and being commercially viable.'”
I disagree and find this almost inflammatory in its complete disregard for environmental impact.
Article: Cobalt supply can meet demand for electric vehicle and electronics batteries (reference)
Here is there summary, quote: “Greater use of electric vehicles might be good for the environment, but further growth hinges on continued availability of critical battery components such as cobalt. Cell phones and other electronics also depend on the element’s availability. Supplies of the metal are adequate in the short term, but shortages could develop down the road if refining and recycling aren’t ramped up or made more efficient, according to new research.”
The bold is my emphasis. Why not advocate a different technology completely?
To add fuel to the fire, (no pun intended) think about cobalt’s source, quote: “Roughly 60% of mined cobalt is sourced from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The element is often recovered as a byproduct from mining copper and nickel, meaning that demand and pricing for those other metals affects the availability of cobalt. Half of the current supply of cobalt is incorporated into cathodes for lithium-ion batteries, and many of those batteries are used in consumer electronics and electric vehicles.”
The authors seem more concerned about meeting the cobalt needs based on today’s technology and usage models without any regard to the impact of DRC environmentally and / or socially. Just a sad, sad perspective to omit those potential impacts and conclude, quote: “the researchers concluded that cobalt supply is adequate in the short-term. They estimate supply will reach 320-460 thousand metric tons by 2030, while demand will reach 235-430 thousand metric tons. The team recommends that the industry invest in additional efficient refining and recycling capacity, so it can continue to meet demand.”
Basically, the demand for recycled plastic is growing faster than the supply (not supply of ‘old’ plastic, but the supply of recycled available plastic).
From Bloomberg, quote: “About 8 million tons of plastics are going into the ocean annually,” he said in an interview. “If you look at plastic packaging, around 95% is not being recycled each year which is $100 billion worth of plastic, and that’s valuable for entrepreneurs.”
And the punchline: “An estimated $80 billion-$120 billion of value is lost because of packaging that goes into the environment, said Navneet Chadha, principal operations officer at the World Bank’s International Finance Corp., which helps fund private sector investment in developing countries. “We have to think of used plastic as a resource, not as a waste.”
Bloomberg posted this today – while somewhat funny, the implications are terrible for ADS quality assurance teams. The magnitude of corner cases is rather breathtakingly large
Quote: “A Tesla vehicle was tricked into speeding when researchers put a strip of electrical tape horizontally across the middle of the “3” on a 35 mile-an-hour speed limit sign. The change caused the vehicle to read the limit as 85 mph, and its cruise control system automatically accelerated, according to research by McAfee. The human behind the wheel was able to slow the car. Here’s the video of the incident. “
Basically, things are the same month to 3 month avg.
|Company||Type||January 2020||December 2019||November 2019||3-month average|
|Alliance Data Systems||delinquency||6.00%||5.80%||5.90%||5.90%|
|Bank of America||delinquency||1.61%||1.60%||1.63%||1.61%|